Comparison

Traditional screening was built around files. Burnt is built around facts.

Most screening workflows still ask teams to trust uploads, chase missing documents, and compare separate reports. Burnt starts with applicant-consented sources and a single reviewable workflow.

  • 01Move beyond PDFs
  • 02Verify at the source
  • 03Unify the report
  • 04Review with context
Screenings dashboard
Burnt dashboard showing source-verified tenant screening instead of document-only review
Track every applicant in one queue. See who has not started, who is in progress, and who is ready for review without opening separate tools.
Short answer

How is Burnt different from traditional tenant screening?

Traditional tenant screening often relies on uploaded documents and separate credit, background, and eviction reports. Burnt improves the workflow by verifying income and employment at the source, tracking applicant progress, and presenting partner checks with criteria context.

Screening workflow

The whole flow fits on one line.

Create the package, send the link, guide the renter, review the result. That simple path keeps screening understandable for applicants and manageable for teams.

01

Create the package

Choose application fields, verification modules, payer model, and property criteria.

02

Send the link

Invite the applicant by email, SMS, listing, dashboard action, or connected workflow.

03

Applicant completes

The renter consents, verifies identity, connects sources, and completes requested partner steps.

04

Review one package

Your team sees status, source-backed facts, partner context, exceptions, and notes together.

Product jobs

Clear work for the team. Clear steps for the renter.

The point is not just to run checks. The product has to help the buyer start screening, help the applicant finish, and help the reviewer understand what is ready.

Property team does

Ask applicants to connect sources instead of emailing files.

Applicant does

Bring partner credit, background, and eviction modules into the same package.

Burnt returns

Use the same criteria and decision record across applicants.

In the product

The package stays connected from invite to review.

Reviewers get status and exceptions in the dashboard. Renters get focused mobile steps. The handoff stays visible as the package moves forward.

Burnt operator dashboard showing screening list and applicant statuses
Review queue Property teams can scan applicant status before opening the full package.
Burnt invite renter flow for sending a tenant screening link
Screening link The applicant starts from one property-specific link instead of email threads.
Burnt applicant verification checklist on mobile
Applicant flow Mobile verification steps stay visible, ordered, and easier to complete.
Review signals

What your team can review.

Burnt keeps the screening output compact, scannable, and tied to the workflow your team actually uses.

Verified

Applicant data from connected sources

Verified

Document fallback only where needed

Verified

One package with report status

Review

Criteria and audit context

How it works

From application link to reviewable result.

01

Replace document chase

Ask applicants to connect sources instead of emailing files.

02

Combine checks

Bring partner credit, background, and eviction modules into the same package.

03

Make review consistent

Use the same criteria and decision record across applicants.

Use cases

Designed for real rental workflows.

Whether you run one unit or a national portfolio, each workflow keeps the answer focused and the next step clear.

FAQ

Questions this page answers.

Tenant Screening by Burnt

Send the link. Guide the renter. Review one package.

Launch with screening links or talk through a portfolio workflow with the Burnt team.

Start screeningTalk to team